|
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SUIT FOR RECOVERY
OF MONEY
IN THE COURT OF CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION AT PANAJI-GOA Regular Civil Suit No.001/200_ MR. ANTANASIO PIRES V/S MR. SALIM IRANI, The plaintiff above-named
humbly states and submits as under: 2) In the month of May 1999, the defendant approached the plaintiff with a request to grant him Rs.1,50,000/-,which according to the defendant was required to be invested in his business considering the long acquaintance between the parties, the parties-plaintiff agreed to grant to the defendant the sum of Rs.1,50,000/- as the loan amount. 3) The plaintiff advanced
a cheque of Rs.1, 50,000/- bearing No.123456, dated 20/5/99 drawn
on Dena Bank, Panaji-Branch. The plaintiff shall rely on the counterfeit
of the said cheque. 5) In the month of June
2000, the plaintiff was in need of money and hence approached the
defendant with a request to repay the said loan. The defendant agreed
to pay the said loan but in some way neglected and avoided the payment
of the loan amount. 7) The plaintiff then
approached his Advocate who addressed a registered notice dated 2/7/2000
to the defendant, calling upon the defendant to repay the loan amount
within 10 days from the receipt thereof. 9) The plaintiff submits that he is entitled to a judgment and decree from the Hon’ble Court directing the defendant to pay to the plaintiff the said sum of Rs.1,50,000/- along with interest @ 12%. p.a. from the date of the promissory note, up to the date of filing of the suit amounting to Rs.18,000/- and for a further interest at the same rate from the date of filing of suit until the realization 10) For the purpose of Court fees and jurisdiction, the relief in the present suit is valued at Rs.56, 000/- 11) The cause of action arose in Panaji because the loan amount was paid, due and repayable in Panaji, the parties reside in Panaji, within the jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court and this Court has therefore the jurisdiction to entertain the suit. 12) The cause of action for the present suit arose when the defendant failed to comply with the terms of the notice under ‘Exhibit C’. This suit is therefore not barred by limitation. 13) There is no other suit pending between the parties on the same cause of action. 14) The plaintiff therefore
prays: PLACE: Panaji Sd/- VERIFICATION I, MR.ANTANASIO PIRES,
the plaintiff above-named do solemnly declare that the contents of
the paragraphs 1-9 are true to my personal knowledge and the contents
of the paragraphs 10-14 are submissions made upon legal advice. Solemnly affirmed at
Panaji, Goa on this 12th day of Sept’00. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |
|||||||
Copyright
© 2004-2005 All Rights Reserved |